For many Americans who for years have been aware of USAID’s involvement in international corruption and regime change (implicated, along with other U.S. agencies, such as the National Endowment for Democracy, which last year brought onto its board global blackguard Victoria Nuland), the recent explosion of information about the JFK-creation and its wider ties to propaganda campaigns and falsely-labeled “news” media come as additional confirmation of its existential insult to truth and our freedom.
And Donald Trump’s move to put on paid leave (not even to fire) approximately 9,706 of its 10,000 parasitic employees comes as a delightful piece of news.
But to others – who, like the USAID leeches, derive their paychecks off our backs – just the meager idea of USAID being actively staffed by 294 is an affront. It’s inhuman, unkind, and, somehow, against the “rule of law.”
This, essentially, is what a U.S. District Court judge just claimed, as he commanded a “block” on Trump’s move to “sort-of” cut away lots of the USAID hive.
